“A great mix of basics and pearls of
wisdom from your years of experience."

  —Liz Wallace,
     Productivity, Inc.

wBooks & Audio CDs   wSeminars & Training   wRecruiting Resources   wFree Tips   wNewsletter   wOrder   wHome

Recruiter's Digest Newsletter Archives

Recruiting News,
Training &
by Bill Radin

Subscribe to Newsletter
More Tips for Recruiters
Return to
Table of Contents


The Recruiter's Digest
 Recruiting News, Training & Commentary by Bill Radin

June, 2008

Right Keywords, Wrong Candidate

Recruiters often ask me how a candidate can be rejected for consideration, even though the person’s resume has all the right keywords.

Simple answer? The job description got lost in translation.

Think about it: Every job exists because a company has a problem. Otherwise, they wouldn't be hiring. Unfortunately, most employers are unable or unwilling to talk directly about the problem; so they talk around it.

Instead of saying, “We’ve got a great team of developers. But they lack discipline, and we’re on the verge of losing a major contract because we’re chronically behind schedule,” they hand you a job description that reads, “The candidate will be expected to broadly influence the technology and direction of the product. Must be proficient with J2EE, JCR, JSF and Ajax and possess a BS or MS in computer science or related field.”

It's a classic disconnect: The hiring manager is worrying about a PROBLEM but translates the solution into a list of QUALIFICATIONS for the job.

Submission Deficit Disorder
From this point on, you and the employer pass like two ships in the night. You submit the resume with the right QUALIFICATIONS and what happens? The hiring manager stares at the resume, trying to imagine how that candidate’s going to solve the PROBLEM.

The keywords are there
you made sure of thatbut the essential qualities needed to solve the problem are unknown, at least on paper. So the candidate’s resume is returned to you, stamped REJECTED.

But it doesn't have to be this way. By interviewing the hiring manager directly, you can understand the nature of the problem and begin to find a solution. Here are some simple questions to ask:

1. What's the most pressing problem you'd like to solve by making this hire?

2. To fix the problem, what would the new person need to do? Please be specific.

3. What problem-solving accomplishments or experience in the candidate's past job would give you the confidence to predict success at your company?

4. Can you think of any knockout factors that would immediately disqualify someone or render them incapable of succeeding at your company?

5. After the initial problem is solved, what lies ahead, in terms of expected results?

Obviously, there are many more questions you should ask. But by digging deeper than the keywords and cliches
and getting to the heart of the matteryou'll add tremendous value and translate a greater number of submissions into face-to-face interviews.


©2008 billradin.com, all rights reserved 
w 5320 Eagleswatch Court w Cincinnati, OH 45230 USA
Customer Care: (800) 837-7224 or

w Newsletter Sponsorship  w Web site Advertising  w Privacy Policy  w Terms of Use